M
TS
Collect News Data

Premier League

/esi/1339/6_A_51_372901_0/index.html?art_id=372901&ESI

Liverpool fail with attempt to trademark city's name

:Headline: Liverpool fail with attempt to trademark city's name:
The Reds had been looking to protect the word 'Liverpool' when used in the context of football products and services.
PA | 3d

Liverpool Football Club's controversial bid to trademark the word 'Liverpool' has been rejected by the government's Intellectual Property Office.

The Premier League club insisted their sole aim had been to protect themselves against mass-produced Liverpool FC merchandise and had hoped to trademark the city's name when used in the context of football products and services.

But, after accepting the IPO's decision, the club's chief executive Peter Moore admitted they had underestimated the level of opposition from independent traders within the city, plus local football clubs and Liverpool City Council.

The club said in a statement: "Liverpool Football Club can confirm its application to trademark the word 'Liverpool' in the context of football products and services has been unsuccessful.

"The club accepts the decision that has been taken by the Intellectual Property Office, due primarily to what the official judgement cites as 'the geographical significance' of Liverpool as a city in comparison to place names that have been trademarked by other football clubs in the UK.

"We will, however, continue to aggressively pursue those large-scale operations which seek to illegally exploit our intellectual property and would urge the relevant authorities to take decisive action against such criminal activity wherever it exists."

Moore said the club's intentions had been sincere but they had misunderstood the implications the trademarking would have had on the local community.

Liverpool chief executive Peter Moore, right, insisted the club had acted in good faith (Steven Paston/PA)

"We underestimated the reaction to it," Moore told the Liverpool Echo. "We had, in very good faith, looked at what we were seeing on a global basis and particularly stuff that was coming into the UK.

"We felt obliged to protect the football club and had looked at other similar situations for clubs that had trademarked their place names in a football context, there are numerous examples.

"We felt that on behalf of the club we needed to do that, but I think it's fair to say that we underestimated the emotional reaction to it and that's our bad."

Moore said the club had met with local businesses to explain their intentions.

"There was no deliberate action to slip it through," he added. "We filed and got on with our business and obviously as things unfolded the reaction was pretty quick and we immediately engaged with the independent retailers and the local football clubs and met with them.

"(We) reassured them that this was not aimed at them and offered them legal protections for if we had been successful."

Liverpool mayor Joe Anderson tweeted: "LFC is a global brand and plays a big part in showcasing our city across the world.

"We have a strong relationship with Peter and his team and the club's importance to the future of this city is without question.

"We will always work together for the people of Liverpool."

body check tags ::
amp_article_372901 : Collect and Make Data not in DataBase  : 
last updated article - 2019-09-26 12:55:25:
html db last update - 2019-09-29 10:04:07 :

ex - 7200 : read : write cache and make html

Click here for more stories about Liverpool

Share this article now:

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Transfer Talk Daily
Match previews - twice weekly
Morning Briefing (7am UTC)
UC
Get the latest transfer news, match previews and news direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Select and display your favourite team's news and scores in this panel
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool77001851321
2Manchester CityMan City75112772016
3Leicester CityLeicester7421135814
4West Ham UnitedWest Ham7331109112
5Tottenham HotspurSpurs7322149511
6Chelsea73221413111
7Bournemouth73221312111
8Arsenal63211110111
9Crystal Palace732267-111
10Burnley723210919
11Manchester UnitedMan Utd62228628
12Sheffield UnitedSheff Utd72237708
13Wolverhampton WanderersWolves7142911-27
14Southampton7214711-47
15Everton7214612-67
16Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton7133510-56
17Norwich CityNorwich7205916-76
18Aston Villa7124811-35
19Newcastle UnitedNewcastle7124413-95
20Watford7025420-162
Scroll for more - Tap for full version

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Transfer Talk Daily
Match previews - twice weekly
Morning Briefing (7am UTC)
UC
Get the latest transfer news, match previews and news direct to your inbox!

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Loading ...

Failed to load data.

Select and display your favourite team's news and scores in this panel
Premier League Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Liverpool77001851321
2Manchester CityMan City75112772016
3Leicester CityLeicester7421135814
4West Ham UnitedWest Ham7331109112
5Tottenham HotspurSpurs7322149511
6Chelsea73221413111
7Bournemouth73221312111
8Arsenal63211110111
9Crystal Palace732267-111
10Burnley723210919
11Manchester UnitedMan Utd62228628
12Sheffield UnitedSheff Utd72237708
13Wolverhampton WanderersWolves7142911-27
14Southampton7214711-47
15Everton7214612-67
16Brighton & Hove AlbionBrighton7133510-56
17Norwich CityNorwich7205916-76
18Aston Villa7124811-35
19Newcastle UnitedNewcastle7124413-95
20Watford7025420-162
Scroll for more - Tap for full version
X

We value your privacy

A part of our GDPR compliance we need to ask for your consent. We and our partners use technology such as cookies on Sports Mole to personalise content and ads, provide social media features, and analyse our traffic. Click below to consent to the use of this technology on Sports Mole.