Friday, September 22
 

Birmingham City

Harry Redknapp: 'I would have got Birmingham City promoted'

Former Birmingham City manager Harry Redknapp claims that he would have led the club back to the Premier League had he been given more time.

Sacked manager Harry Redknapp has claimed that he would have got Birmingham City promoted had he been given more time at the club.

Redknapp was dismissed just 13 matches into his reign following this afternoon's 3-1 home defeat at the hands of Preston North End which leaves Birmingham 23rd in the Championship table.

However, the 70-year-old is confident that he would have led the club back to the Premier League if they had kept faith with him, blaming the team's form so far this season on injuries and a lack of transfer activity.

"I am disappointed. It's been difficult, I have had one week with a new team and new players, one week. It's not an excuse but today I had three of the forwards missing who I would have picked, probably the three most exciting players in all honesty. It takes time to build a football team, not one week. I didn't get the players in I was after in pre-season and suddenly I have got a load of players in," he told the Birmingham Mail.

"A lot of the targets I was after I couldn't get over the line. And I still felt that given time I would have given them a team that would have been challenging for promotion, I had no doubt about that. Maybe not this year but over the next two years I would have got promotion.

"I had to do well this year but I would have stayed because I loved it there, absolutely loved my time there. I am not an idiot, I am not a silly person who goes around saying things, I think I have been around long enough."

Birmingham have lost seven of their 10 games across all competitions this season, including each of their last six.

Read Next:
Redknapp: 'Birmingham will be alright'
>
You May Like
Recommended Next on SM
Redknapp: 'Birmingham will be alright'
Atletico reach Costa agreement with Chelsea
Edinson Cavani offered to Real Madrid?
Rowett: 'Birmingham rejected Lindelof'
Championship Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Leeds UnitedLeeds85211431117
2Wolverhampton WanderersWolves8521138517
3Cardiff CityCardiff8521127517
4Preston North EndPreston843193615
5Ipswich TownIpswich7502128415
6Sheffield UnitedSheff Utd850386215
7Middlesbrough8422105514
8Bristol City83411510513
9Sheffield WednesdaySheff Weds8341107313
10Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest84041113-212
11Queens Park RangersQPR83231212011
12Norwich CityNorwich8323812-411
13Aston Villa8242109110
14Fulham824287110
15Derby CountyDerby73131111010
16Millwall823311929
17Hull City82241415-18
18Reading722367-18
19Burton Albion8224615-98
20Barnsley7214811-37
21Sunderland8134712-56
22Brentford8044712-54
23Birmingham CityBirmingham8116412-84
24Bolton WanderersBolton8026416-122
Scroll for more - Tap for full version
Championship Table
TeamPWDLFAGDPTS
1Leeds UnitedLeeds85211431117
2Wolverhampton WanderersWolves8521138517
3Cardiff CityCardiff8521127517
4Preston North EndPreston843193615
5Ipswich TownIpswich7502128415
6Sheffield UnitedSheff Utd850386215
7Middlesbrough8422105514
8Bristol City83411510513
9Sheffield WednesdaySheff Weds8341107313
10Nottingham ForestNott'm Forest84041113-212
11Queens Park RangersQPR83231212011
12Norwich CityNorwich8323812-411
13Aston Villa8242109110
14Fulham824287110
15Derby CountyDerby73131111010
16Millwall823311929
17Hull City82241415-18
18Reading722367-18
19Burton Albion8224615-98
20Barnsley7214811-37
21Sunderland8134712-56
22Brentford8044712-54
23Birmingham CityBirmingham8116412-84
24Bolton WanderersBolton8026416-122
Scroll for more - Tap for full version

This site uses cookies for Analytics. Click to accept and dismiss this message.